Open sidebar
Reports

OpenSAFELY Service Restoration Observatory: Eleven key measures for monitoring general practice clinical activity during COVID-19

Description
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on delivery of NHS care. We have developed the OpenSAFELY Service Restoration Observatory (SRO) to describe this impact on primary care activity and monitor its recovery. This report accompanies the preprint linked below and describes changes in activity throughout the pandemic for 11 key measures of primary care activity, selected in collaboration with a clinical advisory group considering the following criteria: high volume usage, clinically relevant to front-line practice and whether they are more widely indicative of other problems in service delivery across the NHS. This analysis uses federated analytics on 48 million adults' primary care records, including all adults registered at either a TPP or EMIS practice (>95% of English practices). A regularly updated monthly dashboard is linked below (TPP practices only).
Authors
Louis Fisher, Helen J. Curtis, Richard Croker, Milan Wiedemann, Victoria Speed, Christopher Wood, Andrew Brown, Lisa EM Hopcroft, Rose Higgins, Jon Massey, Peter Inglesby, Caroline E. Morton, Alex J. Walker, Jessica Morley, Amir Mehrkar, Seb Bacon, George Hickman, Orla Macdonald, Tom Lewis, Marion Wood, Martin Myers, Miriam Samuel, Robin Conibere, Wasim Baqir, Harpreet Sood, Charles Drury, Kiren Collison, Chris Bates, David Evans, Iain Dillingham, Tom Ward, Simon Davy, Rebecca M. Smith, William Hulme, Amelia Green, John Parry, Frank Hester, Sam Harper, Jonathan Cockburn, Shaun O'Hanlon, Alex Eavis, Richard Jarvis, Dima Avramov, Paul Griffiths, Aaron Fowles, Nasreen Parkes, Brian MacKenna, Ben Goldacre
Contact
Get in touch and tell us how you use this report or new features you'd like to see: team@opensafely.org
First published
10 May 2021
Last released
12 May 2023
Links

The aim of the OpenSAFELY SRO is to describe trends and variation in clinical activity codes to evaluate NHS service restoration during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This report provides a set of key measures of general practice activity, that are indicative of changes in overall activity throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. These key measures were selected from a range of clinical areas, prioritising clinical topics that would benefit from routine monitoring and targeted action considering the following criteria: high volume usage, clinically relevant to front-line practice and whether they are more widely indicative of other problems in service delivery across the NHS (for example a decrease in records for blood tests for kidney function may be a true drop in GPs requesting these tests or it may be related to delays in laboratories processing the results).

For each of these measures we provide a link to the codelist containing all the codes used for that measure, a description of what the measure is and a brief overview of why the measure is important. We also highlight any caveats, where there are any, for each measure. For each measure we also indicate the number of unique patients recorded as having at least one event indicated by the measure as well as the total number of events since January 2019.

Monthly rates of recorded activity are displayed as practice level decile charts to show both the general trend and practice level variation in activity changes. Accompanying each chart is a summary of the most commonly recorded SNOMED-CT codes for each measure. Using the rate in April 2019 as a baseline, we calculate the percentage change from baseline in April 2020 (1st national lockdown) and April 2021. These changes are used to give an overall classification of activity change as described in the box below.

  • No change: no change from baseline in both April 2020 and April 2021.
  • Increase: an increase from baseline in either April 2020 or April 2021.
  • Sustained drop: a drop from baseline of >15% in April 2020 which has not returned to within 15% of the baseline by April 2021.
  • Recovery: a drop of >15% from baseline in April 2020 which has returned to within 15% of the baseline by April 2021.

Summary of results

These key measures demonstrated substantial changes in clinical activity throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Six of the measures recovered to their pre-pandemic baseline within a year of the pandemic, showing a rapid, adaptive response by primary care in the midst of a global health pandemic. The remaining five measures showed a more sustained drop in activity; asthma and COPD reviews did not recover to their pre-pandemic baseline until around August 2021 and blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular disease risk assessment and medication reviews had a sustained drop in activity that persisted up to December 2021.

Findings in context

Discussion of the specific causes and reasons for the changes in narrow measures of clinical activity we have described is best addressed through quantitative analyses that identify practices in high and low deciles to approach for targeted qualitative interviews with patients and front line staff. However we believe the following broad points may help aid interpretation. Our measures reflect only a few areas of high volume clinical activity; decreases may reflect appropriate prioritisation of other clinical activity. For example NHS Health Checks, which are used to detect early signs of high blood pressure, heart disease or type 2 diabetes, were paused during the pandemic; this is likely to explain the sustained drop in activity in cardiovascular disease risk assessment and blood pressure monitoring. However, in specific cases this may reflect changes in the style of delivery of a clinical activity, rather than the volume: for example, where patients record their own blood pressure at home since, as we have previously highlighted, home monitoring of blood pressure may not be recorded completely or consistently in GP records. In addition, not all reductions should be interpreted as problematic: as part of the COVID-19 recovery, health systems are aiming to be more resilient, responsive and sustainable; complete recovery may not always be appropriate and reductions in clinical activity across some domains may reflect rational reprioritisation of activity. Where these changes in priority have not been nationally planned, data analyses such as ours may help to rapidly identify the pragmatic changes in prioritisation being made by individual dispersed organisations or people across the healthcare ecosystem before those changes are explicitly surfaced or discussed through other mechanisms. For more detail, please see our preprint here

Blood Pressure Monitoring

The codes used for this measure are available in this codelist.

What is it and why does it matter?

A commonly-used assessment used to identify patients with hypertension or to ensure optimal treatment for those with known hypertension. This helps ensure appropriate treatment, with the aim of reducing long term risks of complications from hypertension such as stroke, myocardial infarction and kidney disease.

Caveats

We use codes which represent results reported to GPs so tests requested but not yet reported are not included. Only test results returned to GPs are included, which will usually exclude tests requested while a person is in hospital and other settings like a private clinic.

Rate per 1000 registered patients

Practices included: 6366

Most Common Codes (Codelist)

Code Description Proportion of Codes (%)
72313002 Systolic arterial pressure 96.18
413606001 Average home systolic blood pressure 2.54
407554009 Sitting systolic blood pressure 0.42
400974009 Standing systolic blood pressure 0.37
314449000 Average 24 hour systolic blood pressure 0.09

Total patients: 27.77M (79.30M events)

Change in median from April 2019 (65.03) - April 2020 (9.22): -85.82%

Change in median from April 2019 (65.03) - April 2021 (37.7): -42.03%

Overall classification: sustained drop

Cardiovascular Disease 10 year Risk Assessment

The codes used for this measure are available in this codelist.

What is it and why does it matter?

A commonly-used risk assessment used to identify patients with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in the next 10 years. This helps ensure appropriate treatment, with the aim of reducing long term risks of complications such as stroke or myocardial infarction.

Rate per 1000 registered patients

Practices included: 6351

Most Common Codes (Codelist)

Code Description Proportion of Codes (%)
718087004 QRISK2 cardiovascular disease 10 year risk score 96.49
763244005 QRISK cardiovascular disease 10 year risk calculator score 2.62
1085871000000105 QRISK3 cardiovascular disease 10 year risk calculator score 0.63
752451000000100 Cardiovascular disease risk assessment by third party 0.17
450759008 Framingham coronary heart disease 10 year risk score 0.08

Total patients: 7.38M (10.49M events)

Change in median from April 2019 (6.65) - April 2020 (0.61): -90.83%

Change in median from April 2019 (6.65) - April 2021 (4.14): -37.74%

Overall classification: sustained drop

Cholesterol Testing

The codes used for this measure are available in this codelist.

What is it and why does it matter?

A commonly-used blood test used as part of a routine cardiovascular disease 10 year risk assessment and also to identify patients with lipid disorders (e.g. familial hypercholesterolaemia). This helps ensure appropriate treatment, with the aim of reducing long term risks of complications such as stroke or myocardial infarction.

Caveats

We use codes which represent results reported to GPs so tests requested but not yet reported are not included. Only test results returned to GPs are included, which will usually exclude tests requested while a person is in hospital and other settings like a private clinic.

Rate per 1000 registered patients

Practices included: 6356

Most Common Codes (Codelist)

Code Description Proportion of Codes (%)
1005671000000105 Serum cholesterol level 97.9
1017161000000104 Plasma total cholesterol level 2.0
850981000000101 Cholesterol level 0.09
853681000000104 Total cholesterol level 0.01
365794002 Finding of serum cholesterol level < 0.005

Total patients: 16.82M (32.71M events)

Change in median from April 2019 (23.99) - April 2020 (1.98): -91.75%

Change in median from April 2019 (23.99) - April 2021 (20.94): -12.71%

Overall classification: recovery

Liver Function Testing - Alanine Transferaminase (ALT)

The codes used for this measure are available in this codelist.

What is it and why does it matter?

An ALT blood test is one of a group of liver function tests (LFTs) which are used to detect problems with the function of the liver. It is often used to monitor patients on medications which may affect the liver or which rely on the liver to break them down within the body. They are also tested for patients with known or suspected liver dysfunction.

Caveats

In a small number of places, an ALT test may NOT be included within a liver function test. We use codes which represent results reported to GPs so tests requested but not yet reported are not included. Only tests results returned to GPs are included, which will usually exclude tests requested while a person is in hospital and other settings like a private clinic.

Rate per 1000 registered patients

Practices included: 6361

Most Common Codes (Codelist)

Code Description Proportion of Codes (%)
1018251000000107 Serum alanine aminotransferase level 95.96
1013211000000103 Plasma alanine aminotransferase level 3.83
250637003 Alanine aminotransferase - blood measurement 0.18
34608000 Alanine aminotransferase measurement 0.02
201321000000108 Serum alanine aminotransferase level < 0.005

Total patients: 23.36M (54.14M events)

Change in median from April 2019 (36.0) - April 2020 (7.47): -79.25%

Change in median from April 2019 (36.0) - April 2021 (34.91): -3.03%

Overall classification: recovery

Thyroid Testing

The codes used for this measure are available in this codelist.

What is it and why does it matter?

TSH is used for the diagnosis and monitoring of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, including making changes to thyroid replacement therapy dosing.

Caveats

We use codes which represent results reported to GPs so tests requested but not yet reported are not included. Only test results returned to GPs are included, which will usually exclude tests requested while a person is in hospital and other settings like a private clinic.

Rate per 1000 registered patients

Practices included: 6361

Most Common Codes (Codelist)

Code Description Proportion of Codes (%)
1022791000000101 Serum thyroid stimulating hormone level 97.31
1022801000000102 Plasma thyroid stimulating hormone level 2.54
1027151000000105 Thyroid stimulating hormone level 0.15
61167004 Thyroid stimulating hormone measurement < 0.005
313440008 Measurement of serum thyroid stimulating hormone < 0.005

Total patients: 19.36M (36.16M events)

Change in median from April 2019 (23.65) - April 2020 (3.62): -84.69%

Change in median from April 2019 (23.65) - April 2021 (23.26): -1.65%

Overall classification: recovery

Full Blood Count - Red Blood Cell (RBC) Testing

The codes used for this measure are available in this codelist.

What is it and why does it matter?

RBC is completed as part of a group of tests referred to as a full blood count (FBC), used to detect a variety of disorders of the blood, such as anaemia and infection.

Caveats

Here, we use codes which represent results reported to GPs, so tests requested but not yet reported are not included. This will usually exclude tests requested while a person is in hospital and other settings, like a private clinic.

Rate per 1000 registered patients